Comprehensive framework for evaluation of deep neural networks in detection and quantification of lymphoma from PET/CT images: Clinical insights, pitfalls, and observer agreement analyses.

  • Shadab Ahamed ,
  • ,
  • Sara Kurkowska ,
  • Claire Gowdy ,
  • Joo H.O. ,
  • Ingrid Bloise ,
  • Don Wilson ,
  • Patrick Martineau ,
  • François Bénard ,
  • Fereshteh Yousefirizi ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • William B Weeks ,
  • Carlos F. Uribe ,
  • Arman Rahmim

Physica Medica |

DOI | PDF

Purpose:

This study addresses critical gaps in automated lymphoma segmentation from PET/CT imaging, often overlooked in prior work. While deep learning has been applied to this task, few studies evaluate generalizability on external or out-of-distribution data. Similarly, intra- and inter-observer variability analyses remain rare, limiting understanding of task difficulty. Moreover, most methods emphasize global segmentation metrics, neglecting lesion-level characteristics that are crucial for clinical decision-making.

Methods:

We propose a clinically-relevant evaluation framework to assess four commonly used deep segmentation networks (ResUNet, SegResNet, DynUNet, SwinUNETR) on 611 PET/CT cases from multi-institutional datasets spanning varied lymphoma subtypes and lesion characteristics. In addition to the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), we compute prediction errors on clinical lesion measures and analyze DSC performance as a function of these measures. Additionally, we use traditional lesion-specific detection criteria (1 and 2), providing insights into network’s performance in identifying and localizing lesions respectively, and propose an additional Criterion 3 for segmenting lesions based on metabolic characteristics. Finally, we contextualize network performance by comparing it to expert human observers through intra- and inter-observer variability analyses.

Results:

Networks perform best on large, metabolically active lesions. Their error patterns closely resemble those of expert annotators, while small and faint lesions remain challenging for both networks and physicians.

Conclusion:

Our clinically-relevant benchmarking framework enables more consistent and meaningful evaluation of lymphoma segmentation models, supporting robust decision-making in patient care. The approach is extensible to other architectures and disease types. Code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/lymphoma-segmentation-dnn (opens in new tab)